Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society.
Technology is the important bridge connecting the past undeveloped world to the new developing world. In my opinion smartphone have played a major roll in ending up with communication problems. I completely disagree that phones have caused harm to our society. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraph.
First of all the fear of getting away from our loved once has been converted into a strong bond due to smartphones. My personal experience is a great example of this. Four years ago when I had got admission in engineering college which was far away from my house and I had to stay at university hostel. As I had never been apart from my family for such a long time, I was a bit sad to stay away. But my sadness converted into happyness due to smartphones. I use to talk to my family through vedio call. And the due to the vediocalls I never felt alone, I was always in touch with my parents. As a result I could focus on my studies and this all was possible due to the smart use of techonoly .
Secondly, learning through use of technology is more easy to understand the concepts. Drawing from my own experience smartphones are the easiest way to gain knowledge from different resourses available on internet. For instance during the assignment works in our classes , I used to collect information form the internet which was available at my phone. I use to collect a lot of information and then understand all the theories form its core and then complete my assignment. My phone was the key towards good grades in assignment works. I was always appreciated for my work. It certinly clears that why smartphone are the most useful things.
To conclude, use of smartphones causes a good change in our society rather than harm. This is because the communication gap has been excluded from our lifes, and adapting new thing is posible because of smartphones. And above two are the basic steps to make a good society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: LEAD_ROLL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'major role'?
Suggestion: major role
... In my opinion smartphone have played a major roll in ending up with communication problem...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ed into happyness due to smartphones. I use to talk to my family through vedio call...
^^^
Line 2, column 691, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ssible due to the smart use of techonoly . Secondly, learning through use of tech...
^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ring the assignment works in our classes , I used to collect information form the ...
^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...classes , I used to collect information form the internet which was available at my ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...rnet which was available at my phone. I use to collect a lot of information and the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, apart from, for instance, i feel, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65417867435 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78709822568 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544668587896 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7764397408 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4090909091 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7727272727 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154860516742 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533964476123 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921507342455 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127408724404 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908456905377 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.