do you agree or disagree with the following statement? social media affected our life and ruined our relationships
More people than ever use social media nowadays and we are inevitably engaged to the internet due to our job or some other obligations. Personally, I disagree with the statement that social media can't affect our relationship or ruin it. I will explain why I feel this way in the subsequent paragraphs.
First, we all know that social media are necessary for our day-to-day routine and even some job descriptions required to be active in social medias, However, this definitely can not be a fact that our relationship or marriage is on stake. We all know that there are many deceived people using internet medias to tempt others or send them offers or invitations. Aware of this we wouldn't have accepted anybody's invitation. Therefore, our partner can be sure that even if we want to cheat on him or her, that's not the way we will do it. Mostly people use social media to keep in touch with their co-workers and work in distance or carry out purchases and other activities related to professional or home needs.
What's more is that if we have created and retained a robust nexus with our partner, then nothing can cast doubt on our relationship. Although, that each of us spend time in social media it doesn't mean that we immediately should look for reason to halt the relationship. A small hints of jealousy can affect or ruin the relationship, not the spending time in social media. If we trust our person, we would not make suspicious that he or she is doing something wrong.
In conclusion, I would say that social media can not affect the relationship of two people, because as I mentioned people don't have trust on internet offers. Also, the trust we have on our partner accumulated during years can help us tackle with jealousy and our suspiciousness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ee with the statement that social media cant affect our relationship or ruin it. I w...
^^^^
Line 2, column 379, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...offers or invitations. Aware of this we wouldnt have accepted anybodys invitation. Ther...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...even if we want to cheat on him or her, thats not the way we will do it. Mostly peopl...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...elated to professional or home needs. Whats more is that if we have created and ret...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ach of us spend time in social media it doesnt mean that we immediately should look fo...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o people, because as I mentioned people dont have trust on internet offers. Also, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, as to, even so, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71753246753 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7427110197 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8122734644 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.785714286 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357781928511 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143285303495 0.076458572812 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131905788804 0.0737576698707 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257931127292 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705272949949 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.