Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes it is better not to tell the truth. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Telling the truth or not? It is the question of the millions of dollars, both have their advantages and disadvantages, so what is the correct decision? I believe that we should tell the truth all the time. I think this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, many studies have demonstrated that when people are honest, they feel good with themselves. Also, their minds are in peace because they do not have nothing to hide. It is not easy to tell the truth because sometimes we can destroy the other person’s feelings. The thing is how or what technique we use to transmit our words. For example, I have a friend who was passing for a bad situation in her life. Her husband, shifted on her and she was devastated. I knew from the beginning all the situation and I took the decision to tell her. Consequently, the situation became in a chaos, but at the end she understands and she thanked to my because I was sincere with her. It was a delicate moment, for all, but I knew that telling the truth it will worthy for her.
Second, it is better to tell the truth always to make credible your words and your personality, so this will make that all people around you will trust you. When people lie many time, then the persons in their environment do not trust them. For instance, about ten years ago, I had a coworker that always arrived late to the work for any other excuse. One day his son had an accident and neither of our coworker trusted him because he always was invented different problems. Since that day, he understood that telling the truth will be always better.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that telling the truth will be beneficial for everyone, not only for who say it, but also by who receive it. At the beginning could be painful, but at the end people realize that is worthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. First of all, many studies have demonstr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: NOT_NOTHING[1]
Message: Double negation. You probably should say 'anything'.
Suggestion: anything
...s are in peace because they do not have nothing to hide. It is not easy to tell the tru...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
.... The thing is how or what technique we use to transmit our words. For example, I ...
^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...und you will trust you. When people lie many time, then the persons in their environment ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 435, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
... of our coworker trusted him because he always was invented different problems. Since that...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lling the truth will be always better. In conclusion, I strongly believe that ...
^^^
Line 6, column 129, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...e, not only for who say it, but also by who receive it. At the beginning could be p...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, then, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all, to tell the truth
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49258160237 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48056308385 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519287833828 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1005841068 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.7 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.85 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170002577066 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592082776006 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645495396448 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100839905688 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388712006507 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 11.7677419355 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.