Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
Nowadays, people normally accept the truth that the trustable news is more valuable than other types. However, sometimes there is incorrect news among other news that it is the cause of doubt among people. Some people think that the amount of these wrong information are lower now rather than past, although, some people have an opposite opinion. In my opinion, the amount of lying in modern news becomes more than past. That is due to increasing the volume of data that they produce, moreover people do not have time for examination, and with new technology identifying wrong data is hard.
First and foremost, in modern World, the huge number of news produce every day; therefore, the process of correcting and exploring is impossible by supervisor organizations. Among these immense volumes, it is more likely presence wrong data. In other words, the magazine must fill their content with inaccurate matter since they need to publish them every day. For example, my brother has worked for ten years in a newspaper office. He said that the magazine must be completed for publication; thus, they were obligated to use wrong data or unreliable news.
Second, all of us know, nowadays, people do not have extra time for investigating the accuracy of news; hence, the newspaper is sure that people do not pursue read data. Otherwise, there are a few number of people that they are sensitive to the accuracy of information. For instance, I normally pursue just sports news. I don't have any time in my hand to research that whether the news is from the trustable source or not; therefore, I accept the news without search.
Last but not least, the technology has a lot of achievement in the new world; thus, making some unreal situation is ready. To put it differently, the magazine presents wrong news using new technology that identifying the accuracy of them is hard. As an example, sometimes they publish a photo from celebrity people that they using Photoshop application; hence, detecting it is hard for people that it is unreal.
As outlined above, it is clear that the ways that magazine can present inaccurate data are more likely than past. that is due to the size of data is high, so you will not able to detect altered data, moreover, people are busy and there is not any time for exploring other sources, and technology is the major cause of magazine achievement in deceiving people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...ursue read data. Otherwise, there are a few number of people that they are sensitive to th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
..., I normally pursue just sports news. I dont have any time in my hand to research th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...ccurate data are more likely than past. that is due to the size of data is high, so ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87990196078 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57841156892 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475490196078 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5999100937 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.789473684 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192980015496 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655681166277 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045946102472 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112573785975 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069457091706 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.