Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities U

In this rapidly growing world, the importance of education is an axiom, because of its influence on the child's future and also governments. A question, which is a matter of debate, a controversial one, where the government should spend money on the successful development of a country. On the education of very young or universities. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am, to a great extent, on the belief that I believe that for this goal, the government should spend money on universities.among the several reasons, two of them are in below.

To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justify the thesis is that the students can improve performance as well as they can, which causes a boost in developing sciences. By spending money on the right quality equipment in laboratories and classes in universities, students will have very feels by advance ways and materials for study. So they can be more enthusiastic about hardworking then can gain better results. for example, when a student wants to take a project with an academic professor. If he or she sees that there is not any necessary equipment that are need for doing lab experiments, he or she mostly does not attract doing works well. So going depth, this causes less acknowledge of universities that are an excellent course of developing the country.

Alongside with the first reason elaborated above, by spending money for universities, not only students can have better performance, but also the good universities can attract the other students from other countries. It may be true that in well condition upbringing the child can make them more hardworking and well package that they will be active persons for the country and develop country whit their significant works in the future. However, by spending money and attracting students from abroad, not only can the universities boots their association whit other universities, but also there can be a situation for the companies to employ talented students come from abroad. In this way, they can use them to achieve new technology and knowledge that cause the development of a country.

They were drawing upon the reasons, although there are always some exceptions, which excluded from the general rule. To recapitulate the reasons, by spending money in universities, not only the countries students can do well and because of developing, but also by attracting the talented guys from other countries and employ them in companies, by using the knowledge the country can achieve new technology and development.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...rdworking then can gain better results. for example, when a student wants to take a...
^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
... students from abroad, not only can the universities boots their association whit other univ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, for example, as well as, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09692671395 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96931607675 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477541371158 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8373226458 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4375 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249813382182 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909499475486 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579247086617 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164913263863 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462290159483 0.0645574589148 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.