In this rapidly growing world, the importance of education is an axiom, because of its influence on the child's future and also governments. A question, which is a matter of debate, A controversial one, where the government should spend money on the successful development of a country. on the education of very young or universities. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am, to a great extent, on the belief that for this goal, the government should spend money on universities. Among the several reasons, two of them are in below.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justify the thesis is that the students can improve performance as well as they can, which causes a boost in developing sciences. To put it in general words, by spending money on the right quality equipment in laboratories and classes in universities, students will have very feels by advance ways and materials for study. So they can be more enthusiastic about hardworking then can gain better results. For example, when a student wants to take a project with an academic professors. If he or she sees that there is not any necessary equipment that are need for doing lab experiments, It is all transparent that, he or she mostly does not attract doing works well. Going into the depth, this causes less acknowledge of universities that are an excellent course of developing the country.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated above, by spending money for universities, not only students can have better performance, but also the good universities can attract the other students from other countries. It may be true that in well condition upbringing the child can make them more hardworking and well package that they will be active persons for the country and develop country whit their significant works in the future. However, by spending money and attracting students from abroad, not only can the universities improve their association whit other universities, but also there can be a situation for the companies to employ talented students come from abroad. In this way, they can use them to achieve new technology and knowledge that cause the development of a country.
They were drawing upon the reasons, although there are always some exceptions, which excluded from the general rule. To recapitulate the reasons, by spending money in universities, not only the countries students can do well and because of developing, but also by attracting the talented guys from other countries and employ them in companies, by using the knowledge the country can achieve new technology and development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...A question, which is a matter of debate, A controversial one, where the governmen...
^^
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...he successful development of a country. on the education of very young or universi...
^^
Line 2, column 522, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'professor'?
Suggestion: professor
...ants to take a project with an academic professors. If he or she sees that there is not a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 536, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... project with an academic professors. If he or she sees that there is not any nec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, for example, in general, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2195.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06928406467 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.926903469 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475750577367 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.94265232975 324% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.2149564012 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.117647059 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4705882353 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24872258917 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858286938716 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604074413366 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164734274776 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469827686922 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.