Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People have been arguing a lot whether or not pedagogues should present to students their social and political beliefs. Personally, I think that knowing teachers` points of view can help young people shape their lives. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, children can listen to different points of view on political and social aspects of life and decide which ones are more suitable for them. Students have many teachers in school and if each professor expresses his opinion about the political situation in the world, pupils can obtain important knowledge. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a senior, the political situation in my country was not stable. It was the time of great changes and every citizen has to decide which candidate they will vote in a following presidential election. I recall that many of my teachers told about their preferences and provided reasons why they thought a certain way. Sometimes we even argued about which of the candidates was better. It helped me a lot to understand the political life of my country and decide who I wanted to see as a president. That is why I think it is advantageous for teenagers to have this kind of conversations in a classroom.
Secondly, by providing students with information, professors can engage adolescents in the social life of their communities. If teachers think that it is pivotal to help our neighbors, they can encourage children to actively support those who are in need. For instance, my chemistry teacher was volunteering at a local hospital and helped healthcare professionals to look after old people, who did not have families to take care of them. She told us how thankful her patients were and how proud she was making their days a little bit happier. As a result, many of my classmates decided to follow her way and started volunteering at a nursing home. This helped us to believe in ourselves and become better citizens.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that students should be aware of political and social preferences of their professors. This is because it can help them to create their personal points of view, and can benefit those who are around them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have been arguing a lot whether or not pedagogues should present to students t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...d how proud she was making their days a little bit happier. As a result, many of my classm...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can benefit those who are around them.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87696335079 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81315214747 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1842741102 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.15 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195159726541 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598953629877 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476076172621 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133269369983 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218450959474 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.