Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People have been arguing a lot whether or not teachers should talk about their political and social beliefs in front of their students. Personally, I think that it is beneficial for young people to be aware of points of view of their pedagogues on the matter. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following assay.
To start with, pupils can learn about political affairs of their countries when their professors have conversations about this in a classroom. These days, teenagers are interested in technological devices such as cell phones and computers and do not watch the news on television. Therefore, they do not know what is going on around the world, and in this case, teachers can be a source of knowledge for them on the topic. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a senior, the political situation in my country was unstable and citizens faced a new presidential election. I knew not much about presidential candidates. However, my history professor did not hesitate to describe each of them during school lessons. From him, my classmates and I had a chance to learn about the background of each of the applicants and their plans to manage Russia. It helped me to understand many problems which my country was dealing with and shaped my personal political preferences.
Secondly, by talking to students about social problems, pedagogues can encourage youth to actively participate in the life of their hometowns. School staff responsible not only for providing their pupils with knowledge in literacy and numeracy, but also have to explain to children why it is important to help people around them. For instance, my chemistry teacher was an exceptional one, she volunteered at a local nursing home and founded a nonprofit charity organization to support families with disabled children. During her classes, she often narrated stories about her social engagement and told us how happy she felt assisting people in need. The conversations with her inspired us to start volunteering in hospitals, fire departments, and local libraries and develop our small town. If we had not had such discussions, my peers and I have never experienced the pleasure of helping others.
To conclude, I strongly believe that students should know about their teachers` opinions on a matter of politicians and social issues. This is because it will help young learners increase intellectually, and make the life of their communities better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have been arguing a lot whether or not teachers should talk about their politi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 897, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rienced the pleasure of helping others. To conclude, I strongly believe that stu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, i feel, i think, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08048780488 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94646361401 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563414634146 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.860973882 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.15 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188255217583 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539213476317 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463740266425 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124908273721 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271415633397 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.