Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I totally disagree with that idea, but it seems to me that it depends on each society and it's trends and culture that whether people appreciate and value teachers more in the past or not. I hold this opinion because of several reasons. First, I believe that nowadays people appreciate teachers and value them more than before and they spend plenty of their money on their children's school, so, it benefits teachers indirectly. Second, it the past, most of the people were not educated and they did not prefer to go to school, thus people did not pay attention to teachers in comparison to today.
According to my point of view, people nowadays are grateful for their children's teachers more than before, because they know that their children imitate their teachers beliefs and behavior, therefore, people are willing to spend a lot of money to enroll their children in private and elaborate schools, which might have positive impacts on teachers. In contrast, in the past, people usually were not familiar with educational systems and they did not precisely aware that whats the teachers role in development of society. Consequently, they did not care about teachers let alone appreciate them.
Moreover, because most of the past generations were illiterate, they were not so eager to go to school and usually they did not think about teachers in their community. For instance, my grandfather used to tell me that when he was child, his father did not allow him to participate in public communities specifically schools, because he contended that teachers do not teach students practical and beneficial things, instead, they waste students time by learning them trivial lessons, which are not applicable in routine life. So, my grandfather's father was against to teachers and school. But nowadays parents encourage and motivate their children to go to school and pay attention to their teachers, because parents think that teachers are children's paragon.
In general, as far as I am concerned, today people admire skillful and experienced teachers more than before, because they know than teachers can secure their future by learning them profitable lessons.
- TPO 33 integrated writing skill 70
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubts on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 77
- ONE 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 472, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...s and they did not precisely aware that whats the teachers role in development of soc...
Line 2, column 482, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... did not precisely aware that whats the teachers role in development of society. Consequ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14204545455 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62337612109 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494318181818 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.9438301102 48.9658058833 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.833333333 100.406767564 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256173562048 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108779642891 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063032963453 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173687358878 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508378379163 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.