Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Teachers are truly the backbone of society. They serve as a role model for children, offer guidance, dedication, and give young people the power of knowledge. Some people do not stand with the fact that teachers are not appreciated and valued enough by society nowadays but others think the opposite. As far as my opinion is concerned, I definitely agree that mentors are not getting sufficient importance in society. Today, teachers' reputation and need are getting affected badly because of several reasons. I will explore two of them in subsequent paragraphs.
First, as a matter of fact, as compare to the past, teachers have no power over students nowadays because they are not allowed to punish them if they misbehave or do not complete their homework. The maximum they can do is either send them to the principal's office or inform their parents. The main reason behind this rationale is parents. They do not want teachers to scold their kids. One of my friends who is a science teacher is a profound example of this. One day a kid in her class literally spit on her because she told him to behave and sit properly. As a result, she scolded him and got him out of her class. When his parents got to know the scenario, they did not accept their child's fault. They accused the teacher of scolding their kid which was really disappointing for my friend. As a result, she left the job because she was so disheartened about having no authority even if she is right. This is something not used to happen in the past when teachers had great respect.
The second reason behind my opinion is distant learning. The major drawback of virtual school is that students do not listen to their professors as they are not sitting in front of them like in a class environment. Moreover, with the help of modern technology, many educational videos have encouraged the students to not reach up to teachers. They anticipate they can take in everything on their own. My own experience is a compelling example of this. My son is taking classes online currently due to the pandemic. His teacher shouts all the time because kids do not listen to her. Someone is lying on the couch, other is not paying attention. Furthermore, my son thinks that he does not even need a teacher because he can learn by himself by watching videos on Youtube. This is huge a problem to consider because nothing can replace the expertise of teachers. In the past, students would go to school to learn from the knowledge of masters.
To sum up, educators are losing their worth in society presently because not only they do not have the power to control students but also distant learning has reduced their standards. We as a society must evaluate this depressing issue to reappraise teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | Crash | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | can111 | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | minammah | 73 | view |
- Colonization in asteroidsIn this set of materials the author strongly postulates that the colonization of people in asteroids is a best option to survive as compared to Mars and provides three reasons to endorse it s idea However the professor states that 66
- New rules for disposal of coal ash 78
- Carved stone balls 70
- reading paper is better or watching electronic devices 76
- Ways to lift heavy rocks to build an Egyptian pyramid 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'principals'' or 'principal's'?
Suggestion: principals'; principal's
... they can do is either send them to the principals office or inform their parents. The mai...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, second, so, as a matter of fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2283.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73651452282 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58248757847 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51244813278 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1505498755 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.1 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0666666667 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191406889031 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506312134233 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049946244823 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118192586069 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337781655733 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.