Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
A great deal of attention is attracted to the future problem of human societies dealing with the number of cars which are existed in future. There are a number of people who subscribe to the theory that cars start to disappear in future, however, others disagree. In my own perspective, I do believe that we will experience days having fewer cars because of two main reasons which are elaborated in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the population of all human being is going to grow faster than any time before which will mainly result in some unfavorable consequences of increasing the vehicles. In other words, the huge number of people who will be born in future will unquestionably need more comfort like personal cars. Therefore, it will produce huge traffic jams and a rising need for parking spaces. Our present situation is a compelling example of what is going to be happed in future in lower scale. Nowadays we have terrible traffic problems in big cities, as a result, authorities have established new rules which confine the use of cars and motorcycles in particular area of the city. I think this kind of rules will be more serious in future and the forbidden areas will be enlarged in order to regulator the numerous cars.
Secondly, there will be a time in our future that these huge amounts of produced gases will harm all the individuals and make the life too intolerable. In fact, the environmental difficulties that we face today maybe become the principal place of debate in most international associations and finally lead to restricting the use of personal cars. Consequently, people find their private automobiles useless and try to get used to other vehicles like bicycles or scooters. The fiction movies that are shown today can be perfect imagine of our future planet. I think that some other kinds of transport systems will be invented and the tax of using cars will grow drastically. As a result, it is not logical for future societies to use these types of cars that we have today.
In sum, above from aforementioned explanation, it is obvious that I do believe the number of cars will be reduced surprisingly. This is just because of the growing population which brings us terrible traffic jams and also environmental problems that both cause the restriction of cars. I think we should think of another way of transportation in next twenty years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...th the number of cars which are existed in future. There are a number of people who subsc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...the theory that cars start to disappear in future, however, others disagree. In my own pe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in fact, in particular, kind of, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88697788698 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8167430227 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520884520885 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.300955607 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240741808311 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758372757185 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448266749585 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141497428523 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429954813944 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.