Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.”
Cars have been a major means of transportation for various reasons. They are comparatively accessible, affordable and easier to drive. The debate on whether or not the use of cars will be substantially reduced in the coming future holds different views. Some argue that, they will soon be replaced by a much superior vehicle while others disagree. In my personal opinion, I agree that in twenty years there will be less cars in the streets for several reasons.
To begin with, with the current rate of technological development, a new vehicle offering better services will be invented within twenty years. Cars even after being easily accessible, still have a lot of shortcomings and if these are addressed by a new invention, then certainly cars will be outdated. For instance, just yesterday I watched a youtube video covering first test run of hovercraft. As stated by the major scientist, they will be able to complete this invention within 10 yrs and make it available to the public. If this happens, then cars may be replaced by this miraculous invention which offers easier parking, less fuel need, more speed, better comfort and obviously the childhood dream of many of us. It’s clear to see that how the use of car will reduce in the coming twenty years.
Secondly, with the increasing population, cars may be out of use. To be more specific, higher number of passengers will demand a more spacious transport using the same amount of fuel. It is evident that with the limited roadways and parking spaces, we will be forced to move towards public transportations vehicles using the same amount of energy to transport higher number of people. A compelling example for this claim can be taken the rumor of China planning to come up with an official rule of banning the additional purchases of private vehicles in order to promote people in using more efficient public vehicles. For this reason, cars may be out of use on the coming twenty years.
Lastly, cars also face the danger of green transport initiatives that are being popular among the general public. Cars have been criticized for being a major source of environmental pollution. As a result, environmentally concerned citizens have started to replace their use by more green alternatives like cycling to work or sharing a vehicle. This initiatives also possess additional health benefits and are certainly cheaper. This may be the reason, why lots of government and offices are promoting this practices. For instance, this morning I heard a news piece on French Prime minister commuting to his office in a bicycle, so as to create the support the above mentioned green initiative. It is not an exaggeration to say that with a similar steady increase of above practices, cars will decrease in the near twenty years.
To sum up, the number of car users is certain to decrease in the future days. Invention of better transports, need of more commodious vehicle and green initiatives led by people are a clear evidence to this statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...able and easier to drive. The debate on whether or not the use of cars will be substantially r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: A_MUCH_NN1[1]
Message: Maybe you should omit the article "a", leaving only 'much'.
Suggestion: much
...gue that, they will soon be replaced by a much superior vehicle while others disagree....
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...or vehicle while others disagree. In my personal opinion, I agree that in twenty years there wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...gree that in twenty years there will be less cars in the streets for several reasons...
^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...comings and if these are addressed by a new invention, then certainly cars will be outdated. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 99, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...atives that are being popular among the general public. Cars have been criticized for being a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 346, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...e cycling to work or sharing a vehicle. This initiatives also possess additional hea...
^^^^
Line 15, column 630, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...r commuting to his office in a bicycle, so as to create the support the above mentioned ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, as to, for instance, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2526.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99209486166 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77756234833 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51581027668 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 793.8 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3068824794 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.04 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.24 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259984090626 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822573949133 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676121511268 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148209158315 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626409309743 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.