Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of working either fewer days for lengthy hours or more days of short hours. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely choose to work lesser days for longer hours. Personally, it is my firm belief that fewer workdays are better for a number of reasons, and I will develop those ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, one must travel to office and return home at the end of the day. These eat up a good portion of the day, especially when the office is far from home. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. One of my job-place took 2 hours to reach. I had to spend 4 hours of my day just on the road. Effectively, my 8 hour job became 12 hour job. You see if I had the opportunity to work longer to make up the work hours in three days, I would definitely work in very lengthy hours to avoid the traveling time loss. As a result, my traveling time in a week would have come down from 20 hours to 12 hours. That is a whole day of work! For this reason, I think it is a better idea to work lesser days for prolonged hours.
Secondly, one will get the opportunity to do important personal works on more number of days. If there is only 2 free days in a week, all of the personal works must be scheduled in these 2 days. So one will hardly find a day to rest. But, if there were 4 free days, I will definitely get the opportunity to rest and schedule personal work sparsely in those 4 days. Drawing from my experience, my bother had 2 workdays each of the duration 18 hours. He had plenty of time to rest and do other stuff easily. But, one of my friends had 6 workdays each required 6 hours. In spite of both having the same weekly workhour, my friend hardly had any time to do personal stuffs. Moreover, my friend had to get involved in work and travel every day, which didn't let him rest enough. It is certainly clear to see why more workdays are disadvantageous.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I personally support 3 work days for longer hours.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'job' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'jobs'.
Suggestion: jobs
...fectively, my 8 hour job became 12 hour job. You see if I had the opportunity to wo...
^^^
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work longer to make up the work hours in three days, I would definitely work in v...
^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...If there is only 2 free days in a week, all of the personal works must be scheduled in the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 747, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ved in work and travel every day, which didnt let him rest enough. It is certainly cl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, i think, as a result, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.26616915423 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49342220219 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465174129353 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8660209118 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5652173913 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4782608696 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86956521739 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301709688024 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944910789564 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672784602588 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204746880724 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580303527535 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 58.1214874552 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.19 10.9000537634 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.6 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.