Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
The use of devices that can be connected to the internet, like computers, phones and ipads, should be prohibited from the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the development of technology, internet becomes increasingly pervasive, especially in teenagers’ daily lives. Therefore, it has been widely debated whether devices that can be connected to the internet should be allowed in the classroom. While some argue that bringing these things into the classroom can make it easier for students to look for online information, I reckon, however, that they actually should be prohibited due to drawbacks in several aspects.
First of all, the internet is an awful distraction for classroom. It is hard for almost all students to refrain from doing something irrelevant with the ongoing courses even if they are not intended to do so when bring those devices into the classroom, swearing to themselves that only Wikipedia would be used. However, it is not what always happens. For example, a student finishes googles something confusing with his or her iPad and by far nothing is wrong. Yet before the iPad is put back to the drawer, it suddenly occurred to the student that the email box hasn’t been checked that day. As a result, maybe 10 minutes would have passed before the student refocuses on the class. Such distraction is really detrimental to the students’ development.
The second drawback is that teacher might also be influenced by those devices. It is actually very clear to see from the teaching table what the students are doing. If finding that quite a few students are playing their electronic devices when there is no need of the internet, the teacher must be very angry, or very upset at least, thinking that the lecture must be too boring to draw the students the attention. As a result, the teacher might proceed with a bad mood, which certainly exerts unfavorable effects on the course. What’s worse, there are still other students who are not distracted by the devices with the internet. Still, they are influenced indirectly due to the low spirit of the teacher. Thus, these devices should really be prohibited from the classroom.
Finally, some would argue that these devices facilitate with note-taking, since typing is much faster than writing. In my opinion, however, taking note by hand is a very good preparation for reviewing the courses because the notes took in class are comparatively messy and need further refining. It is the process of rearranging the notes that help with the digestion of knowledge. Additionally, students can even type the notes on computers or ipads after the class if they like, which not only avoids the distraction but also contributes to a reviewed and organized notes. In light of this advantage of hand-writing note, the smart devices are further proved useless in class.
Based on discussions above, it is reasonable to draw the conclusion that devices that can be connected to the internet should be banned from the classroom since they have possible distracting effects and subsequent bad influences and they are not suggested to be used as note-taking tools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 248, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested being'.
Suggestion: suggested being
...sequent bad influences and they are not suggested to be used as note-taking tools.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, really, second, so, still, therefore, thus, while, at least, for example, i reckon, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 15.1003584229 232% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2519.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13034623218 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8002806859 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515274949084 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1476837694 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.52173913 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.347826087 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.04347826087 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249320611186 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734831579087 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881678330872 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164529874283 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830289019484 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.