At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, students almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why?
With students being a very important part of every university, they spend almost all their time in campus. Therefore, it has been widely debated to what degree students are supposed to be involved in making decisions about daily issues. While some argue that experts should be hired to make those decisions like the open hour of library or the menu of the cafeteria, I reckon, however, that students should participate in these decisions, which benefits both the students and the university.
First of all, students are better aware of their own requirements of daily issues. The so-called experts only make decisions based on statistics and their previous experiences. However, there isn’t a standard that applies to all universities, so the decisions must be suitable for the actual situation, which is known by nobody but the students themselves. For example, when it comes to the opening days of library, experts might conclude that there are so many empty seats on Sunday that it is unnecessary to open the library on that day according to the average data of all universities. But actually, students in this particular university happen to be used to go to the library on weekends. Thus, the experts the decision will contradicts the students’ habits.
The second benefit students will get from making these decisions is the ability to make surveys and the experience of being a leader, both of which exert positive effects on the future development of students. To be specific, students in charge can’t make any decision without firstly find the requirements of most people. They have to learn to be fair and stand for the interests of majority. Take the food choice of the cafeteria menu as an example. Students must create a committee to start with, and they encourage their classmates to vote for their likes and dislikes from an as-prepared list of foods. After that, they have to discuss the menu with the university to have it approved. The whole process will teach a student a lot, yet these experiences won’t exist if an irrelevant expert is responsible for the decision.
Finally, the school can also benefit from not hiring experts but recruiting students to make the decision, since they will save a lot of money which would have been used to pay for the works of experts. With this extra money, universities can promote the salaries of professors, increase the investment on scientific research and build more advanced facilities in campus. Admittedly, some decisions of students might not be as financially favorable as those of experts, since they are not clear of the exact expense if their decisions are implemented. However, this cost is not as important as all these benefits mentioned above if students are involved and thus it is worth paying.
Based on the discussions above, it is reasonable to conclude that it will be more agreeable if students are involved in making decisions about daily issues due to the facts that they can have precious experiences and better campus life, while the university may reduce its budgets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 737, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'contradict'
Suggestion: contradict
...ds. Thus, the experts the decision will contradicts the students' habits. The sec...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i reckon, first of all, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2588.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08447937132 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76431692129 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49115913556 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 818.1 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5380791028 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.238095238 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2380952381 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287967864217 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902171150658 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672508215333 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182097790327 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852552028641 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.