Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country?
When people visit a new place, they often choose museums as a must-see place. Some people believe that museums are the best place for learning about a country. As far as I am concerned, I strongly agree that museums give enjoyable learning with concise and extensive information. This essay will provide further aspects and examples to support this notion in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, museums provide an exciting way to understand about a country. To be specific, most museums have numerous ways to attract a visitor’ attention, such as pictures, graphic designing, and models. Moreover, all of the remarkable experiences contribute individuals to effectively learn a culture or history in several countries. To illustrate this, Museum of Siam, one of the best museums in Bangkok, has a large number of visitors every season. This place represents Thai cultures in many ways which can attract all ages people such as its old-styled architecture and real objects displaying. Therefore, visitors obtain a deeper understanding of Thai cultures than they learn from books by relating to real items and interactive installations.
Secondly, another fact that supports my standpoint is that visitors acquire concise and extensive information from each museum. Museums also summarize tremendous information for easy understanding. Moreover, they design their exhibitions for less time to extensively get the main issues about a country. Therefore, these are a place that supports all visitors to quickly and readily know about a nationality. I can attest this from my own experience; when I travel abroad, I usually go to their national museums. Most of them have many different exhibitions about their countries such as national foods, local handicrafts, and traditions. Furthermore, I also spend no more three hours to learn all main topics. For this reason, museums become a famous place to learn about indigenous data.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that learning national information in museums is the best. This is due to the fact that most persons can enjoy their learning, and the information in museums is concise to easily understand in a short time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...raphic designing, and models. Moreover, all of the remarkable experiences contribute indiv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...one of the best museums in Bangkok, has a large number of visitors every season. This place repre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 532, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...eir national museums. Most of them have many different exhibitions about their countries such ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37861271676 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99030727278 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546242774566 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7298950639 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.05 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233400897714 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765319048829 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593699178604 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148707581517 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367470391419 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.