Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, due to the advanced breakthrough of technology, there are a lot of means of communication for people by which they can keep in touch with each other. The controversial question which arises here is whether, in the case of a project, it is better for member to communicate in person than by e-mail. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that it will be more beneficial for people to be able to handle the project by e-mail. To support this, there are several reasons two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason which comes to my mind is that, nowadays, people have hectic daily schedules, and they do not have enough time to do all their tasks when they are required to do all of them in the way of face to face interaction. By using e-mail or other means of communication, a group members can stay in touch with each other, and also they can do their other tasks on that time. For example, a couple of years ago, I was working on two different projects with two different companies. I shared my achivements with my colleagues through e-mail, and we discussed by mailing instead of being near each other. At the end, I completed my duties in both project on time. If I was supposed to go to meetings and present in discussions, it would take a significant part of my time. Had we not used the technology, I would not have been successful in my both projects.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that, communicating about a project in person required all member to gatter in a certain place. All workplaces stand in big city, in this regar, the members may get stuck in dense traffic through their ways to go to the meetings.This may bring about some mental problem for them and icrease their stress level due to their concern about time issues. Moreover, this seems to be time-consuming. People can stay at their home and spend more time on that project instead on getting stuck in bumper-to-bumper traffic which results in a more efficient consequences in their project.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the fact that people can produce better work in their projects even when they communicate by e-mail. The fact that they can pursue their different tasks at the same time, coupled with that they can stay more productive and save their time for better efficiency, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of means'.
Suggestion: a lot of means
...d breakthrough of technology, there are a lot of means of communication for people by which th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
...r other means of communication, a group members can stay in touch with each other, and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...hrough their ways to go to the meetings.This may bring about some mental problem for...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 434.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65668202765 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74392620295 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467741935484 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.1503837307 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.882352941 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5294117647 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270416154413 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957017575815 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640071613606 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182720405222 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412475109383 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.