Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Undoubtedly, our modern life is much more complicated than the past because people need to work and interact in a team. While many people believe that communicate about a work project in person can be more effective, others agree with the obverse idea. Nevertheless, from my point of view, I believe classmate or colleagues with communication in person can get better result than sending e-mail. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, during the communication in person we are able to understand each other very well, which is difficult in other communication methods. In fact, when we are discussing in a work setting, we can express our feelings and present our side for a subject in the projects to others, but sending an e-mail can't carry all the communicational aspects such as feelings or opinion. Thus, working in the same place allow group members to have an effective interaction with each other about project and get a better result. For example, last year a research team from United States wanted me to collaborate with them in an international project. We had to communicate with each other by sending e-mail after doing our task, but we had some problems because there were some limitations in sending materials or even discussing more enough about the project with members and coordinator. Even sometimes there was a problem because of misunderstanding of what they imply. Therefore, if we had a chance to work together and speak in person, all problem could have completely solved.
Furthermore, communicating in person can increase classmates or colleagues motivational level for the project. Talking about the projects in the meetings can be used as a powerful tool to create a team working sprit in classmates. Researches show that people who work in the office as a team can get better result in the massive projects than people that work in distance. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic a lot of jobs faced some restrictions to work remotely. A lot of co-workers have to communicate with e-mail from their home. Consequently, this period of time revealed that a lot of companies with huge projects failed because of remote working system.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that group members should communicate about a project in person. Because speaking face to face is the best way of communication that will avoid problems, and in person communication increase members interest and motivation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ojects to others, but sending an e-mail cant carry all the communicational aspects s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ail from their home. Consequently, this period of time revealed that a lot of companies with h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, even so, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06341463415 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94055319007 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49756097561 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5990291894 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.263157895 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94736842105 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335304583871 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112213152822 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548465251517 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216657303002 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391492230654 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.