Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the sophisticated modern life, most people have busy lives due to their jobs and their duties. Some people prefer to work with their colleagues through texts or e-mails, however, I prefer to keep my connection with them in person. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the most important point when we are in a team project is that we should share our ideas and solution easily in a serious problem. Being near each other and talking about the main subject can help us to understand each other without any misunderstanding. For example, last semester I had a difficult project for the Compiler course and we should solve a complicated problem. My classmate and I, first tried to work separately and being in relation together by e-mail for just sharing our results but after some weeks we didn't have any achievement, therefore, we dicided to go to the university computer center and work on a project together simultaneously. We succeed in a short time because we could share our ideas directly and explain them together clearly.
Besides, working with our colleagues in person may help us to find a great friends. These days usually we don't have enough free time for relaxing and release our stress. If we communicate with our colleagues face to face we can make a friendly relationship and gradually, we have peaceful and stressless hours. the friendly environment could lead to a better output of our projects. For instance, I had a project last year and I should communicate with my colleagues by e-mail and other applications. That situation made me feel anxious however, after one month we could continue our communication face to face. The friendly atmosphere helped me be calm and with more performance.
In conclusion, if the classmates or colleagues work on a project in person their results will be better surely. This is because they can share their thinks and ideas better. Also, their friendly atmosphere helps them to relieve their stress and have better performance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 534, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ing our results but after some weeks we didnt have any achievement, therefore, we dic...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
...rking with our colleagues in person may help us to find a great friends. These days usually we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... a great friends. These days usually we dont have enough free time for relaxing and ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... we have peaceful and stressless hours. the friendly environment could lead to a be...
^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er output of our projects. For instance, I had a project last year and I should c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, talking about, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91040462428 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80513775446 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517341040462 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6020022403 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3888888889 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21036172898 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757766041943 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693337766737 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134571783416 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203775131202 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.