Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
This question represents the arbitrary choice regarding the way of communicate. Some prefer people elaborate their ideas physically while some incline to express them digitally. As far as I am concerned, my own preference and experience have led me to conclude that people will work better for the project if we communicate about it in person.
To begin with, personally, I expect better performance if I communicate about a project in person, for it will be more easily to observe others. By discussing face to face, the reaction and emotion presented by others will be much more readable, which means I can notice instantly if there are something controversial or inappropriate. For example, once I discussed my proposal with professor by email, I misunderstood the meaning that contained in the words, which the professor typed. Therefore, the mistake let me receive the bad grade on that assignment eventually.
In addition, I believe that communicating face to face is more efficient than sending email. This statement may sound absurd, since sending email digitally spends less time. However, just because of its instancy, people usually tend to not reply it efficiently. Take my friend, Jeff, for example, he always shows the inclination of postponing replying email, as he thinks he can do it later after he received it.
Finally, communicating about project physically can encourage people to make more effort on it. Imagining you discuss with your classmates and colleagues in person, and everyone express their thoughts about the project sincerely, hoping all of you make all-out effort on the project to accomplish the project perfectly together. By contrast, the other situation is just cold and indifferent alphabets on email that exchange some information for the project. Apparently, at least for myself, the former one makes me want to work harder on the project.
Given the reasons above, I firmly believe that communicate with others in person can make a better result. This is not to say that the opposite opinion is totally unreasonable. Nevertheless, I believe I have substantiated reasons to support my point of view.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24637681159 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97622872241 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8872362558 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.555555556 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277476653241 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768479749837 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848111420359 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14267126276 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753741021189 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.