Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, education has played a prominent role in prospering society and eventually fulfilling its people. Schools and universities are the cradles of education; therefore, many policies have been made to enhance the productivity of universities and schools. One of the most challenging topics on which there is no consensus among people is the best way to accomplish a project. Opinions are divided into whether team working is more beneficial for students, or doing the assignment individually is a better option. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that although working in a group has its own advantages, the benefits of working on your own outweigh the disadvantages. There are several reasons to support this, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
Unfortunately, there is always someone in a group who is prone to not intervene in the project's procedure and take a free ride. This takes a drastic toll on the assignment and its quality. In other words, when one of the members does not contribute to the project at all, he/she will put other members under a great amount of pressure and tension, which will contribute to others' anxiety and affects their productivity adversely. Take my personal experience as a compelling example of this. A couple of years ago, I was assigned a project about the effects of air pollution on peoples' health. All the students were put in a group of four. I was blind to the fact that working in a group has its own hurdles until of my classmate gave up and did not participate at all. Therefore, because of a tight deadline, we did not have an ample amount of time to complete our responsibilities properly, and failed. We not only did not broaden our knowledge in that specific subject but also I lost the opportunity of being a top student.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that, without a shadow of a doubt, team-work will excel one's skills in cooperation conspicuously; however, it enables students to be proficient in one aspect of the project. To be more specific, students often shoulder responsibilities equally. As a result, each of the students will concentrate on his/her part; he/she will need other students to learn about other aspects. To talk about it in detail, in the aforementioned situation one of my friends shouldered programming, which was intolerable for me, so after even three years, I could not write a program in friendly users application, such as Python successfully.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that students should do their tasks lonely. The fact that they do not experience irresponsibility of others, coupled with they learn all ins and outs od a subject entirely, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'projects'' or 'project's'?
Suggestion: projects'; project's
...up who is prone to not intervene in the projects procedure and take a free ride. This ta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...shadow of a doubt, team-work will excel ones skills in cooperation conspicuously; ho...
^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'users'' or 'user's'?
Suggestion: users'; user's
...I could not write a program in friendly users application, such as Python successfull...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, in summary, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93459915612 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04194024468 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54641350211 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9180258543 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.380952381 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252076332675 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637242414713 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397421642338 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146078789916 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100360532972 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.