Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, people have been encountering numerous successful managers. In this regard, while some believe that being a manager is an intrinsic value, others hold that this is an ability that can be gained throughout people's lives. I subscribe to the latter view due to some reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored hereunder.
First and foremost, to prosper in one specific aspect, people need to be educated in spite of their latent talents. To illustrate, without a doubt, academic materials are one of the prominent factors which enable people to climb the ladder of success in their carriers. Being gifted in a major does not necessarily lead to prosperities or perform more effectively than others. To talk about it in detail, I have worked in a well-known company for several years, once they decided to employ a manager. Therefore, they were inundated with resumes describing the candidates' qualifications. Finally, my supervisor could not choose between two candidates. One of them was highly educated, while the other one's family was manager, and being a leader was in their blood. So, this placed him in a dilemma, and eventually, he chose the former candidate. After several years, he is still one of the best managers, thanks to his knowledge and rich educational backgrounds.
Second, although talented individuals should be respected, practically, developing in a carrier is linked with gaining experiences. To elaborate, mature people are able to handle a situation more appropriately than a gifted person. One of the challenges of leading is to come up with an efficient solution in case of emergencies. It seems that a middle-aged person has considerable experience that prevents a situation from becoming worse, regardless of their intrinsic capabilities. For instance, whenever I encounter a problem with my workers in a laboratory, I use my father's advice, who was the ex-manager of there and got experience gradually.
In summary of what has been illustrated in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that most people have the potentials of being leadership. The fact that a well-educated person is more prone to be thrived, coupled with maturity brings about overcoming a hurdle, is the reason which strengthens my view.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in summary, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20273972603 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05893324895 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594520547945 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8403879576 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9473684211 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2105263158 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143844534919 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039657951611 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352089050301 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845349251743 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236649465211 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.