Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is undeniable that cars play a major role in people's daily lives. However, the trends in car demand have been called into question. Personally, I believe that in the future society has to tolerate more automobiles and there will be no plunge in the quantities of cars. I feel this for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the population grows exponentially and there is not an effective way to put a stop to this growth. As transportation is one of the prominent elements of municipal, an increase in population leads to a great expansion in mobility, one of the features which satisfy movements is the means of transportation. As a result, the demand for car ownership will rise. to be more specific, two years ago when I was a freshman student I was assigned a research paper about the effects of different modes of transportation on the emission being released into the air. It was predicted in the near future lung cancer will be observed regularly an impact of numerous cars in the city.
Moreover, technology has penetrated deeply in all aspects of our lives and every day a new application is launched in consequence people become more enthusiastic about it and spend money to achieve it and also use it. The same thing can apply to cars. These days, car companies strive to manufacture more equipped cars regardless of whether or not they will be efficient. Young people, especially men thirst for a brand new car, therefore, a decline in desire for novelty should not be expected.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that in twenty years there will be no decrease in the number of cars. This happens because the population growth rate is ascending which has an impact on car ownership. Also, humans are all perfectionists so they do their bests to fulfill their desire.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...the demand for car ownership will rise. to be more specific, two years ago when I ...
^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...acture more equipped cars regardless of whether or not they will be efficient. Young people, e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as to, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79047619048 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85949462294 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6603206884 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3125 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18329118794 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563392131068 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386921566707 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10840515131 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00839110326268 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.