In many places, students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school. Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning, but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning would be better for students. Which view do you agree with and why?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Schools have had a prominent effect on the prosperity of society conspicuously and enable students to not only broaden their knowledge but also burgeon their talents as well as their abilities. One of the most challenging problems on which there is no consensus among people is about the appropriate time of the day to attend schools. Opinions are divided into, whether students should be early birds and start their schools early in the morning, or be at school around midday. As I was once a student, it is my firm conviction that it would be better for students to go to school in the early part of the day. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, there is no doubt that the best time for learning is in the early morning. A piece of accurate evidence revealed that in the morning, the mind is fresh, and also human's intellectual ability is more developed. Meanwhile, learning at that time of the day prevents students from a superficial understanding and helps them to be more concentrated on their lessons. Take my personal experience as a compelling example, a couple of years ago when I was an elementary student, my parents used to go the work very early in the morning, and because they did not want to leave me alone for a long time of the day, I was registered in a school where the classes were held very early in the morning, and my parents and I woke up in the morning simultaneously. I remember vividly our neighbor's girl attending her school almost an hour after I had returned from it. Although our teachers and school were the same, she always had problems with lessons and did not get their concepts properly, and I helped her a lot to get through this. If I had gone to school at that time of day, I would have been oblivious of the immense effect of learning early in the morning.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that time is a precious gift for all of us, which is irrevocable, so it is all individuals' responsibility to appreciate its value. Statistics showed that early birds catch the worms. Also, when individuals start their day as early as possible, they will have a long time to do some productive activities which are beneficial for them eventually. For instance, in the situation mentioned above, I was able to participate in some extra classes, and I flourished my talents not only in music by playing the piano but also in sports by doing martial arts. As a result, my school's curriculum enabled me to use my time as much as I can.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that schools should be open early in the morning. The fact that in this way, educators learn much better, coupled with use their time appropriately, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... us, which is irrevocable, so it is all individuals responsibility to appreciate its value....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, well, while, for instance, in summary, no doubt, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60784313725 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73065105964 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482352941176 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8718955579 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.684210526 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8421052632 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319374763575 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101944983908 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746382967426 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19217278355 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741143815514 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.