Some people believe that spending time away from people we care about helps us improve our relationship with them, because being away from these people makes us realize how important they are to us. Other people believe that to improve our relationships with the people we care about, we should spend as much time with them as possible, because spending time apart can damage or harm a relationship. Which view do you agree with and why? (Spend time away)
Throughout history, people have been seeking novel things to fulfill themselves; although everything has changed since then, communicating is an exception. As people are social creature, being in touch with others is one of their basic amenities. One of the most challenging topics on which there is no consensus among people is the best way that guarantee a relationship. Opinions are divided into whether a long-distance relationship are effective in its durability, or not. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that staying close to each other is one of the main participants for improving an emotional relationship. There are several reasons to support this, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, without a shadow of a doubt, humans need help when they encounter a problem or hurdle. In other words, some moments in every one's life are intolerable, and without help of other members of family, it would not only become tough to endure but also impossible to solve it. To be more specific, it is less possible for an individual to come over an obstacle lonely. Friends are intended to offer their helping hands to be there for one another. Take my personal experience as compelling example of this. A couple of years ago, when I lost my grandmother in a calamity accident, I became so desperate. I recall vividly my friends whom canceled their appointments and postpone their projects, to be with me. Had I not my sympathetic friends at that harsh time, our emotional bonds would not have tightened remarkably.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that in the modern era, life has become noticeably complicated that everyone is busy with their own tasks to accomplish them appropriately. As a case in point, most of the people are overly burdened with multiplicity of tasks which can have a drastic toll on the quality of relationship; meanwhile, staying away from each other will even double it. According to statistics, with the proliferation of technology people are more encumbered with various responsibilities; therefore, they can not allocate their time to their friends and families properly which increases their dissatisfaction and affects their closeness adversely. Subsequently, there is no compensation for that but paying painstaking attention purely.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that people are more elated when their side by side. The fact that supporting each other in difficulties, coupled with being busy decreases paying attention to your partner, is the reason which strengthens my claim
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, while, in summary, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13425925926 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0420436375 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56712962963 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.482618426 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201439884806 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553510938042 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046125441763 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121450644824 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447082454994 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.