Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the modern era, the growth of technology has made people's life more convenient, and the internet played a major role in this success. One of the most challenging problems on which there is no general consensus among the people is about the internet's cost. Opinions are divided as to whether people should be offered internet access at no cost, or they should pay for the internet. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that, like other services provided in a city, people have the right to use the internet for free. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, the internet broadens the opportunities for landing a job and also providing people with disseminating information. In other words, nowadays, most of the employees manage their tasks via the internet; meanwhile, the internet provides many learning opportunities and productive research activities for educators and learners. As a result, they will be proficient in their specific major, and eventually, society will benefit from their expertise. Take my personal experience as a compelling example, a couple of years ago, when I was studying in my master's and working on my thesis simultaneously and because of the cost the internet in my residence, which was not marginal to be ignored, I went to the university to use its internet which enables me to access a wide range of materials needed for my thesis and complete my project. In this way, I would not only get exhausted, but also, the benefits did not outweigh the hurdles, and the cost of the internet brought me about to be graduated after four years. If the internet had been accessible for free, I would be more useful for my society.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that it is a prudent course of actions to make the availability of the internet for all the citizens at no expense. Some people have a limited budget, and their budget does not almost stretch to afford to buy the internet. The government deprives them of having this basic amenity and does not adhere to social justice.
For example, whenever I am thinking of labor children and suffers and difficulties they undergo to participate in their online classes, I imagine how their social life would be if they have had the equality to use the internet.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that the internet should be free for all the members of society. The fact that it facilitates working and education, coupled with everyone in the community, should receive equal services is the reason which strengths my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...allenging problems on which there is no general consensus among the people is about the internets...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...he internets cost. Opinions are divided as to whether people should be offered internet acces...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, as to, for example, in summary, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2219.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85557986871 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.745203697 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520787746171 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.9675273575 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.529411765 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8823529412 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279151388656 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978251532326 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601105549736 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155500882512 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527747588112 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.