Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Throughout history, people have got in touch with each other for various purposes. One of these purposes that play a prominent role in an individual's satisfaction is friendship. One of the most challenging topics on which there is no consensus among people is about the length of friendship. Opinions are divided into whether humans are much delighted with their handful of long-lasting friends or with their ability to make a new friendship. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that a long-life friendship is a precious gift that cheers humans up. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, long-life friends are more reliable and trustworthy in comparison to new friends. In other words, when an individual comes across an unexpected plan or a hurdle, their best friends provide assistance and also can keep his/her secret. As a result, it would be a kind of relief for that person which directly leads to great convenience and makes him/ her happy and elated. Take my personal experience as a compelling example of this, a couple of years ago, when I had had fix my plan to migrate to Canada and had read about all ins and outs of my trip and its requirements, of a sudden I realized that I could not transfer money to my university in Canada due to banned international transaction and if so, I would lose the opportunity of attending the university in four months. Therefore, my friend, who is more than a friend to mine, offered me to pay that money on my behalf. Had she not stood by me in that tough time, I would not be in the best university and be cheerful right now.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that almost everyone not only enjoys their old friend's companionship but also respects his/her privacy. As friends with more than ten years of memories of friendship have much in common with each other and are on the same page, they would spend a great together, and they would have the time of their life noticeably. For instance, whenever I hang out with my close friend, I do not feel the passage of the time, and we laugh until tears come down from our eyes. The interesting part is that only two of us understand what we are laughing at.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that long-life friends lead to happiness. The fact that these friends can be counted on in difficulties, coupled with they understand you much better, is the reason which strengthens my claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...rposes that play a prominent role in an individuals satisfaction is friendship. One of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'fixed'.
Suggestion: fixed
..., a couple of years ago, when I had had fix my plan to migrate to Canada and had re...
^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'fixed'.
Suggestion: fixed
..., a couple of years ago, when I had had fix my plan to migrate to Canada and had re...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in summary, kind of, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66371681416 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72296153838 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528761061947 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.5499480204 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.111111111 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22243340258 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697454587206 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584529831898 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140477030281 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483349960466 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.