Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Throughout history, people have been searching for various things that make them elated and satisfied with their lives. One of the most challenging topics on which there is no consensus among people is peoples' happiness. Opinions are divided into whether people live happily these days, or in the past life was more satisfying. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that, although in the modern era, people are inundated with numerous responsibilities, their lives are full of enjoyment compared to the past. There are several reasons to support this, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following essay.
First and foremost, the proliferation of technology leads to an invention of various brand-new devices which not only meet peoples' need but also they are less energy-consuming and more time-saving. Technology makes people experience a high standard of living. Moreover, the growth of technology applies to other aspects of society, such as medical and social interaction. The fast-paced evolution enables scientists to push back the frontiers of knowledge and discover new medicines curing acute disease, which was once believed to be fatal. Also, the internet, which is now a prominent factor in communicating, offers long-distance relationships to be in touch with each other, and as a result, tighten their emotional bonds noticeably. In consequence, lifespan has been prolonged conspicuously, which increases life satisfaction remarkably.
Another worthwhile reason to be mentioned is that after the revolution, legislating new rules caused people to have social equality. In other words, in retrospect, people used to suffer from inhumanity, and they were deprived of their basic rights. To be more specific, people with lower status in society were dependent on others to have basic amenities of their lives, and most of the time, they were overcome with affluent families. However, after imposing new rules, people were more in control of their own lives and had the right to decide for their futures, even the one who was in calamitous poverty. According to statistics, in the last century, most farmers and their families died because of a severe famine, even though they were doing agriculture seasonally. This example is sufficient evidence of discrimination and dissatisfaction.
In summary of what has been illustrated and discussed in detail, it is a foregone conclusion that people can enjoy their lives more frequently today. The fact that technology brought about convenience, coupled with social equity, has enabled people to live more freely, is the reason which strengthens my claim.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, in summary, such as, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35662650602 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98380006935 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587951807229 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3658477187 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8421052632 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2850671142 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829469770952 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472818060434 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172827526797 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620971080098 0.0645574589148 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.