Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
During our student life, we ought to complete various types of projects task and it helps us to extend our knowledge. People are having a hard reaching on a consensus whether the projects are given by the teacher do with a group as it is more efficient than individual. A plethora of folks is hold conflicting views. As far as I am concerned, I firmly believe that it is more efficacious if we do it with a community. There are several reasons that support my idea and I will explore it in the following essay.
To begin with, a project holds many types of work that is immensely arduous to do alone. As sometimes it must be done within short time and the person who is going to complete it is very unfamiliar with this new project. Hence, Students become confound after seeing for the first time. Consequently, they feel hopeless how to start their projects and after all pass some days without doing anything. In contrast, the same project if they start with others persons then they can share their idea and they can distribute and and manage their task. As a result, they can get over their difficulties easily and no one feel any distress.
The second point that comes to mind that we are not expert for every sector. It is true that human beings are an expert for particular subjects. Therefore, it is onerous that if someone inexpert. For example, in graduate life, our honorable teacher gave me a projects based on Organic matter. I felt very nervous and did not take sound sleep as I was new in the the research project. So, I shared it with my others friend and they helped me a lot. Moreover, they assisted in performing statistical analysis.
Given in the factors above, we may reach a conclusion that the students learn less or imperfectly if he or she does it alone
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 520, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...hare their idea and they can distribute and and manage their task. As a result, they ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a project' or simply 'projects'?
Suggestion: a project; projects
...ate life, our honorable teacher gave me a projects based on Organic matter. I felt very ne...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...id not take sound sleep as I was new in the the research project. So, I shared it with ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...id not take sound sleep as I was new in the the research project. So, I shared it with ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, after all, for example, in contrast, in short, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54347826087 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52342331239 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590062111801 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3546899542 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73684210526 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247303017604 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626446988119 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477144343499 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132793804069 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488041381873 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.