Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not respect their teachers as much as they did in the past.
In new world, human being are thinking about how to have a prosperous relationship with their vicinity people such as family members, friends, strangers and in academic society the teacher-student relationship is not exceptional in this issue. The latter one has been relatively complicated over the course of time. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that this connection and mutual respect is becoming dull. Personally I agree this statement due to various reasons, two of which I am going to elaborate upon to support my viewpoint in the following essay.
To begin with, students are not serious on their studies and whatever their teachers convey them. Therefore, they underestimate their instructor and the knowledge overall. This might be rooted in their family and society circumstances. It can be assumed that the society and families, however, is attempting to provide proper opportunity and accommodates for young people to pursue the academic studies and land a prosperous career in the future. But, youth are more rebellion than before, so they intend to wander and do nothing, just enjoy their spare time. My nephew, for instance, is an eighteen-year-old boy who in spite of his father surveillance, does not care about his courses all the school period and most of the time is complaining that his teachers are not good at teaching and their behavior are not his favor at all. My perception is that he definitely incline to neglect his studies and consequently he is reluctant to respect his teachers as people who instruct those courses.
Another worthwhile point to be mentioned is that there is a gap between two generations either parents and teachers with young people. To be more specific, youth are not reliant more on elders and this has led a distinct gap between two generations. Now, what can bridge this gap is social media and smart phone. Hence, mostly students are texting or surfing in the Internet or social media at home or even in the school or college classes instead of listening to their teachers. In fact, it is not merely young people guilty, but whole society, school and family are commitment of this dilemma and they have to try to tackle it properly. This is to say, technology and mobile devices could be very profitable, if people learned and thought youngers how to exploit it in a suitable method. At college, for example, instead of chatting and distracting by their mobile phones while the professor is speaking, students could take notes and search information regarding the lesson. More ignorance of the class would lead to more disrespectful behavior toward teachers.
In conclusion, due to the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that nowadays youth are careless to their behaviors toward the teachers than they did past. This is because not only their negligence to study and knowledge led to the teachers ignorance, but also the gap that has been emerge between youth and elders has been filled by social media and technology in the wrong way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...gence to study and knowledge led to the teachers ignorance, but also the gap that has be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 285, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'emerged'.
Suggestion: emerged
...norance, but also the gap that has been emerge between youth and elders has been fille...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 15.1003584229 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 13.8261648746 217% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2514.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00796812749 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78370043491 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51593625498 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6972322973 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9047619048 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.80952380952 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233502666235 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630954867258 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051097438403 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134619614841 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343162804685 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.