Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to choose friends that can have fun with you than to choose friends that will help you when you need them.
Undoubtedly, friendship is the backbone of every individual's life. No matter where they are, what they do, or how type is. It is important that in today's life everybody needs to be dependent on a friendship to be happy or support each other. Some prefer to seek friends who are just for their fun times. I rather choose to make my friendship based on faithfulness and enlisting the helping hands of each other. In the following essay, I will elaborate on my reasons.
To begin with, friends for fun and entertainment can be easily replaced by other people who can entertain us better than previous ones. To be more specific, people like diversity in their lives, and their desire and tendencies will transform after a short run. If they choose their friends according to having fun, they will substitute them with some others to experience different hobbies in different ways. Consequently, this kind of relationship will not be long-lasting and two people will be hurt from such a friendship. One example from my own life is compelling with this issue. When I was in high school, one of my classmates who newly advent to our class, started to make friends with some. At first, everybody in our class intended to be friend with the new classmate, because they believe that they enjoy and have lots of fun with her. After a while, they understood that she could not be a reliable friend, due to the fact that she intend to change her friend constantly and spend with a new person to have new entertainment. Thus, she was abandoned by all and became alone.
The next reason worthy of note is that in today's life, true friends who give us a hand are so valuable assets and more reliable people whom hardly can we find them easily and maintain our friendship. In this line of thought, some friends are worthwhile to have and continue our relationship with them. In fact, every individual is involved in his hectic life and difficulties, therefore, is it so vital to rely on faithful and loyal people who get help and advocate us in hurdles and every time that we are exhausted. No matter, this support be emotional or financial, it is important that they exist beside us in every situation we need them and vice versa. There is a well-known proverb that says "a friend in need is the friend indeed".
To recap, having considered all the above-mentioned reasons and examples into account, I believe that having a friend with sympathy and a sense of support is much more worth than a friend who is just for fun, because of the fact that friends for entertainment can be easily substituted by other ones and true friend who get our hand are rare and reliable in every situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ly, friendship is the backbone of every individuals life. No matter where they are, what th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 209, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: Because
...orth than a friend who is just for fun. Because of the fact that friends for entertain can be easily sub...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in fact, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6843220339 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6628237618 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489406779661 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.859574133 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25746352087 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809212153081 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548650504846 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165702577562 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426515149121 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.