Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Telling the truth in different circumstances of relationship between people is always challenging. Some people think that they should tell truth or lie based on the situation that they are involved in. It means that in some cases, telling lie can be a better choice instead of telling truth. In my opinion, telling truth always is better choice and has better subsequent results than telling lie. I will use two main categories of people relationship in societies as a proof to my opinion.
Telling lie in frienship would be harmfull for both side. Some people thinks that sometimes they need to tell lie to their friends because telling truth would cause disappoinment for their friends. I think that this idea always has a subsequent results which would make problems for their relationship. For instance, I had an appointment with my friends and I arrived to the appointment late. The main reason behind of this was sleep. but I used traffic as an excuse for coming late. After walking on the street we went to our home street and my friend understood that there is no traffic on our home street. Hence I felt terrible about this lie.
Sometimes telling lie will cause divorce. Telling lie to the life partner, attacks the relationship directly and increases the expectation in marriage relationship. Increasing this expectation is also causes arguments in family and divorce. For example, one of our relatives told lie to his wife about the salary and his position at work. After some months he couldn't afford his wife's expectation in buying cloths and life expenses. Hence argument started between them and finally they got divorced.
In Conclusion, people should prefer telling truth to each other in different kinds of relationship that they are involved in. I used two main types of relationship that people are engaged in their daily life. In both cases, telling lie has so many subsequents that none of them couldn't predict.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 435, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...e main reason behind of this was sleep. but I used traffic as an excuse for coming ...
^^^
Line 2, column 609, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...there is no traffic on our home street. Hence I felt terrible about this lie. Someti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... position at work. After some months he couldnt afford his wifes expectation in buying ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ion in buying cloths and life expenses. Hence argument started between them and final...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...s so many subsequents that none of them couldnt predict.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96307692308 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6838566263 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492307692308 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2852939041 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.3181818182 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7727272727 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154863727327 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543645323542 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482295091263 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104745519453 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447456696011 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.