Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration of any relationship.
Use specific details and examples to support your answer.
The basis of life is a relationship. Some people believe that never telling a lie is crucial for every relationship. On the other hand, others think the exact opposite of it. From my point of view, the pros of always telling the truth outweigh the cons for the following reasons.
Above all, telling a lie only hurt person who tells it, not others. Even though how good you hide the truth, it will always live in your mind which completely feel guilty every moment when you think about it. From my experience, when I was in seventh grade, I went to the park with my friends without the permission of my mother. After the day it happened, I feel like I was the worst person in the world. It hurts me, so I decided to tell all the truth, after telling it, I understand that the lie cannot hurt other people who do not know but it only disturbs the ones who know it.
Furthermore, the main pillar of all relationship is a belief of people and if someone breaks the pillar it will destroy the relationship. Two strangers become a couple because they rely on each other and they divorce because they do not rely on each other anymore. For instance, if the husband cheats on his wife, the relationship would probably be damaged because there is nothing left to advocate their relationship.
All in all, telling a lie has a bad influence on a relationship because it breaks the trust of people. I strongly believe that always telling the truth is vital for the relationship to last longer.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, for instance, i feel, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 270.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53333333333 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52938830799 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2425129394 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4285714286 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18055122963 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657933632819 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463172370383 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116500949903 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306624446761 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 86.8835125448 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.