Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Students take part in different sorts of events at universities, to name a few, sports, social activities, and classes. These activities are of equal importance and thus should be granted with same amount of financial funds, as some people argue. As far as I am concerned, this statement cannot afford further analysis and my reasons for holding so will be explained in the following paragraphs.
Admittedly, attending sports and social activities has salutary effects on college students. There is no denying that playing sports will improve students’ physical and mental health, and that socializing will facilitate their interpersonal and communication skills. And it is justifiable for colleges to allocate part of their budgets to build adequate sport facilities and support student activities. Nevertheless, sports and social activities are not as essential as classes and libraries in the context of university.
First, teaching in classrooms and studying in libraries play an irreplaceable role in realizing the fundamental educational object. The paramount goal of higher education is to cultivate qualified citizens with appropriate political, legal, economic, and cultural training, as well as competent professional knowledge. Take me, a student majoring in second language acquisition, as an example. I learned theories of linguistics, rules of Chinese language, and teaching methods in compulsory courses. Besides, I read a range of books concerning Chinese culture and history out of personal interests. Without the strong support from my university to teaching and learning resources, I could not have enjoyed the excellent education quality.
Another reason for emphasizing on classes and libraries is that they concern the college’s reputation and sustainable development. There never lack ranks of universities nationwide or worldwide based on the teaching quality and scientific accomplishment. The public basically consults on these ranks to form their evaluation on higher education institutions. Besides, incoming students tend to favor top-ranked universities. And student quality in turn has an impact on colleges’ long-term advancement. In this case, in order to attract smart minds and earn prestige, universities cannot prioritize teaching and researching too much. Therefore, a large portion of financial support should be inclined to classes and libraries.
To sum up, despite that sports and social activities benefit students in some aspects, their importance is not to be compared with that of the classes and libraries. Consequently, it is more reasonable to allocate financial support from universities in favor of the latter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...njoyed the excellent education quality. Another reason for emphasizing on classe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79240506329 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25170730303 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579746835443 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8408672204 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9545454545 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262763622209 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693694927417 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602209762941 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150120651834 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560255211387 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 10.9000537634 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.