Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Environmental issues are too complex to be handled by individuals.
Environmental issues have won people's attention in the recent years. They directly affect people's lives. Some NGOs increase people's awareness. They try to inform people about potential threats that imperil their livings. Some people are of the opinion that everyone should take an appropriate action for reducing the harmful effects on the environment while others hold the opposite opinion. Even though people should participate in various programs to compensate their negative influence, but I insist that the most important duty is to the government. In the following, I am willing to support my perspective by proposing two main arguments.
First and the foremost reason lies in the fact that effective measures need considerable authority. Some actions can be taken just by government. I concede that everyone is part of the solution. However, we by ourselves cannot make significant changes. On the other hand, we can encourage our friends to consider environmental effects of their decisions. For example, we can vote for those politicians who have effective plans for these problems. In addition, some measures need a high level of authority that only legislators have. For instance, they can ban the use of some materials that cause harms to some animal and plant species. In that case, they can take care of these problems by appropriation of funds for them. For example, they can spend money on removing waste materials from the seas.
Another subtle factor rests on the notion that benevolent actions by ordinary people can precipitate the existing problems. In other words, we have to consider various aspects of our actions. Environmental scientists should conduct research on these matters and propose a solution for them. There numerous cases that different scientists and experts have a paradoxical point of view about a problem. For example, in the last year, there was a group of local scientists who wanted to transfer some local animals to other parts of the world in order to save them from extinction. However, some scientists in the country opposed to their action since they thought that it might put other species lives to danger. In that case, they provide further information which those experts did not consider.
To sum up, I would like to point out that governments should take action to environmental issues. However, people can indirectly have a great impact on the government's policies and strategies. Not only are the government able to make great decisions and power but they have also more knowledge than individuals. We all should remember that our environment belongs to all of the creatures. Therefore, we should not violate their living right.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...emember that our environment belongs to all of the creatures. Therefore, we should not vio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22170900693 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76388135726 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538106235566 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.78346824 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.9655172414 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9310344828 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72413793103 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0338647231486 0.236089414692 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0110756970814 0.076458572812 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0242846317234 0.0737576698707 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0229436649987 0.150856017488 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00783996581766 0.0645574589148 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.