Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Nowadays, people are living in a big, competitive, and difficult world. Each country, all over the world, wants to develop its economics, society, and also make its people wealthier than before. As far as I am concerned, the statement is saying wrong information for paving the way of developing, so I disagree with it. There are several reasons in this regard, two of which are of great important, which are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that, the age of near the end of teenage until the end of each degree in the universities, is the best time to "plantation" each person for the countries' future. The ability of working and thinking is growing as fast as it can in that period, so it is of great importance for governments to focus and plan especially enterprise and pay money enough to flourish each student in the universities. By doing so, any country, can pave the way for developing. Most of development country, spend lots of money not only on its students, but also they search and find intelligent students in others inasmuch as to gather the elites of all over the world in that "golden age". As a result, a country, which wants to make itself stronger, must rely on their "reservoir of brain", universities.
Foremost, industry is a basement of economics, and also the basement of the industry, without any shadow of doubts, is science. The main stream of science is located in its core, universities. By spending money on universities, for example, supporting the dissertations or establishing new start-up companies, which are rooted in universities, governments can connect the industry to the science. Therefore, it will be a good connection between economics and universities. With this in mind, they help their countries to prosper and develop more and more by passing the time. On the other side, spending on very young children is not a bad idea, but the age of the youth is more important than the youngest, since the government should plan to spend on both side by more concentration on young adult in universities.
To sum up, by taking to account all mentioned above factors, countries, especially which are in the way of developing, should concentrate on their universities, rather than other ages. Because they can support other ages better if their "golden age" works without any stop to move their economics and use their best ability. Finally, I, personally, hope most of the governments pay more attention to their universities and support each idea of individuals in there.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, therefore, as to, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05373831776 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12691464623 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509345794393 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7227569219 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265405865911 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775946529614 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717679582729 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154051529309 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961383725122 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.