Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in such a sophisticated world where people are putting all their efforts to be well-informed, sticking to variety of news resources and providing more is a rational task. One of the most controversial issues having been brought up recently is whether using single references to be up to date or using variety of refreshed resources. Some people strongly hold the view that attending single resource is more reliable than checking different news resources. However, the majority of people contradict this idea and look at this concept through a different lens. As a matter of fact, I subscribe to the view of those people since it is not only more reliable but also inform us more information. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into some conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my point of view.
The first exquisite reason to be mentioned is that different resources give various data and one can soon understand the validity of the news. To illustrate, if someone mention a gossip being established in a magazine about a well-known actor, he/ she will try to find the real fact meticulously and in this process he/ she will find out a lot of delicate information. Moreover, a noteworthy refreshingly intelligent statistical data conducted by social research, revealed in my country indicates that people do not trust on single resource because they know it is not only boring to stick a single reference but also it suffers from incomplete information. Some scholar from all over the world contend that people are more curious that before and the technology has changed people. So in order to estimate the effect of various resources on people’s curiosity, they organized an experimental program. The results were surprising: Over 90 percent of people tend to utilize different references.
Another subtle point which deserves some words here is that in this way they can improve other knowledge. An example can shed light to this idea. Take for example an individual who watches more TV channels, is more likely to have lots of information about them. Furthermore, there has been a great deal of research into the potential benefits of various resources on the creativity of people showing that people particularly, young adults prefer that get more information through watching various programs.
To put it briefly, contemplating all reasons and factors, one soon realizes that different resources for informing news is not only causes people have more information but also they might have the sense of creativity and learn other aspects. Consequently, I firmly recommend that individuals insist on attending different references.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
... of the news. To illustrate, if someone mention a gossip being established in a magazin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, for example, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2251.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21064814815 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94363542199 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548611111111 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7772212519 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.055555556 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142908840726 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459869162961 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273752371116 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09105811548 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222023344862 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.