Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Regarding the issue of whether it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a successful future in the past, different people hold divergent opinions. Some would maintain the standpoint that they disagree with this statement because they contend there were still many different type of jobs which made people unconvincing to choose one of them. I partly agree with their notion. However, from my point of view, I agree with this statement, it is true for people to identify what type of career lead to a secure future more easily in the past.
Firstly, the type of career or job have increased a lot compared to the past, which become more complicated and difficult for people to choose. As the whole fast-paced society developed, many jobs and careers are invented, like professional video games player. As a saying goes in China, a man is afraid of entering a wrong career for himself which means the choose for future career is critical for everyone. Consider my own experience which can shed some light on this issue. I was a college student whose major was civil engineering, whereas I disliked it and didn't have any talent in that major because my poor space imagination. Thus I changed my major to computer science which suits my interests. However, not everyone can be so lucky, the real thing is numerals young people hesitate whether the career or job they choose can lead to a successful future considering their interests and social development.
Secondly, the fast development of artificial intelligence had replaced many existed jobs and no one would know what jobs would be replaced in the future. Twenty year ago, no one would think about the development of AI could have such a severe result on jobs. However, this is a big problem we must to face today, more and more jobs don't need people to do. From this perspective, it becomes much harder for people nowadays to identify what type of job can lead to a bright future because no one wants to be replaced by robot or machine. According to a survey conducted by Wuhan university in 2018, it predicted about 12% jobs would disappear in 20 years, like security or even driver.
Admittedly, it is undeniable that the types of career or job are also many in the past. Nevertheless, the type of career of job nowadays tend to change faster and have the impact of AI. All the factors lead it is harder to identify ideal career today.
To sum up, whereas there is an argument for disagreeement that it was easier to identify what type of career would lead to a secure future, namely the same big number of jobs in the past, increasing a lot of jobs, coupled with the development of AI impact on choosing jobs makes a strong case for the statement that in the past it was easier to identify what type of career of job would lead to secure, successful future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t because they contend there were still many different type of jobs which made people unconvin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'games'' or 'game's'?
Suggestion: games'; game's
...s are invented, like professional video games player. As a saying goes in China, a ma...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... a wrong career for himself which means the choose for future career is critical for every...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... engineering, whereas I disliked it and didnt have any talent in that major because m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ajor because my poor space imagination. Thus I changed my major to computer science ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...jobs. However, this is a big problem we must to face today, more and more jobs dont nee...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... must to face today, more and more jobs dont need people to do. From this perspectiv...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, thus, whereas, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2350.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67196819085 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54887367917 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457256461233 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3777519208 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.15 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361342058011 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113985909105 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106449102485 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248702066866 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127655581234 0.0645574589148 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.