Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In civilized and modernized societies, ability to make a decision by young people has been always among primary concerns of human beings' lives. Today it is axiomatic that parents usually elapse the longer part of their life on working and pay less attention to their children. A plethora of people possess the convention that it is better for youth to do their activities and find their way by themselves, whereas others might hold exactly the opposite view. I strongly and firmly endorse the former conviction instead of the later one. In what following, I am going aptly delve into the most outstanding reasons to advocate my point of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that the influence of social medias and internet is the key factor to shape the personality of people, exactly the younger one. Therefore, because of these effects, youth learn a lot of social activities and aspects of life by these mentioned ones. In my own experience, it should be stressed that I have learned some social behavior and personality factors from the movies and any essays which were on the internet.
Another equally noteworthy point supporting this opinion is that the effects of dramatic pace of societies' development and improvement. This object forces the world to change quickly, so the old people's knowledge and their favorites will cause a lot of differences between old and young people. For example, nowadays, the type of clothing, the kind of music, foods and anything else has got many changes according to the past. Therefore the old people not only can not be so sufficient to teach young people or affect on their decisions, but also in some issue they learn from youth inversely.
To put it in briefly, all the enumerated reasons lead us to the conclusion that the today young people can independently do their daily activities and decisions better than the past. However, a paramount issue that must be mentioned is that this can not used as a prescription for everybody and some counter examples might exist, which are not mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...the world to change quickly, so the old peoples knowledge and their favorites will caus...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 428, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...got many changes according to the past. Therefore the old people not only can not be so s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 512, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... so sufficient to teach young people or affect on their decisions, but also in some issue...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 255, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
... must be mentioned is that this can not used as a prescription for everybody and som...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in brief, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97988505747 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64778541515 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.250990876 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.785714286 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277965614873 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083883513138 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922259099767 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161889556732 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979186765254 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.