Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use that there are now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use that there are now.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Highly developed transportation has benefited people in many ways. Personally, I think that in twenty years human beings will utilize more cars than they do now. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, people enjoy driving and they will continue purchesing them. Contemporary automobiles have many features, which make driving truly comfortable and pleasant. If an individual feels great while operating a car, he will use it continuously. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I am passionate about traveling and when I have a few days off work on a raw, I take a trip to a new destination. I travel by my personal vehicle which is equipped with a GPS system for navigation, an air-conditioner to maintain a pleasant temperature inside, and a radio to listen to my favorite music. Not only that, but my automobile is reliable and never breaks down. Although there are many other types of transportation are available for adventurists to reach their destinations, automobile is the most convenien one. That is why I think that people will not stop exploiting cars in the future.
Secondly, cars are neceassary to commute for many citizens. In many places in the United States, public transportation is undeveloped and for people who live in rural areas, personal vehicles are the only way to get to work on time. For example, I live on the outskirs of a large city, where no buses are available for locals. Therefore, I have to have an automobile to drive to a pharmacy where I work or to a grocery store to buy food for my family. Moreover, as I read in a local newspaper, the government is not goid to develop public trasportation in the neares future, and so dwellers of my small community and I will have to continue driving our vehicles every day. Although we could ride bycicles in the summertime in order to commute to worplaces, in the winter this would be imposible to do. As a result, residents of my town will keep havily utilize their cars in twenty ears from now.
Iin conclusion, I strongly believe that the number of automobiles on roads will not decrease in the future. This is because cars are enjoyable to operate, and because many people need them to commute.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore to buy food for my family. Moreover, as I read in a local newspaper, the gove...
^^
Line 3, column 713, Rule ID: SUMMER_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'summer'.
Suggestion: summer
... Although we could ride bycicles in the summertime in order to commute to worplaces, in th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs are enjoyable to operate, and because many people need them to commute. ...
^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause many people need them to commute.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75063613232 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91761765778 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2075096354 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9047619048 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7619047619 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137174568426 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446256308618 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595874984433 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987880734283 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579974245537 0.0645574589148 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.