Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since the advent of governments they have had some assignments. These days, by advancement of technologies and other developments, their assignments become more complicated. Improving the internet access and public transformation are some of the most important works. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether governments should spend more money on improving internet access or public transportation. Some people possess the conviction that public transportation plays a key role in all aspects of life and therefore, governments should pay more attention to it whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that in 21-century having an appropriate access to internet in more crucial. I personally contend that public transportation is a mainstay of economy and lots of other aspects of any country. The following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that nowadays, public transportation has a significant effect on economy of every country. To shed light on this issue, consider the waste time of a person when he wants to go to his work place. He spends much time in traffic and after he arrives to the work place he is bored and exhausted. Thus, the efficiency of him is lower than it is anticipated.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that public transportation as well as economic, has a decisive influence on environment. In today's world, one of the most important issues is the pollution of air. Private cars have a detrimental effect on air. The polluted air leads to some disease such as various cancers, heart attacks and so on. Therefore, we can see a chain of catastrophic events as a result of using private cars. The noteworthy research, which is conducted in our country, reveals that the damaging effect of air pollution is equal to more than 10$ billion for each year.
In conclusion, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that although improving the internet access has some merits for the country, the merits of improving public transportation overweigh and governments have to spend more money on it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Since the advent of governments they have had...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 678, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'appropriate access'.
Suggestion: appropriate access
...te and allege that in 21-century having an appropriate access to internet in more crucial. I personal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
... reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$10'.
Suggestion: $10
... of air pollution is equal to more than 10$ billion for each year. In conclusion...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22375690608 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11412724998 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549723756906 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7414849733 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.055555556 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254265846607 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699387908719 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872884769757 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151594249211 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096452115795 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.