Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is universally agreed that technology developments like internet have tremendous effect on modern life. Accordingly, these kinds of advancements facilitate human life in many aspects like transportation. I personally believe that government should allocate more budget to improve Internet network than public transportation for three main reasons.
First and foremost, by emerging technology human no longer need to transport or use public transportation for daily requirement. Instead, individual's demand for Internet will rapidly increase because in modern life, people do their basic work through Internet. A classic example is the way people shop today. They do not need to go to malls and hyperstars to buy a clothe or their food because they are easily able to order their whatever they want by smart phone application. On the other hand, these apps work by Internet. Therefore, it is essential to improve internet access than public transportation.
Additionally, spending budget for public buses and taxis just has a few benefits. However, Internet brings various kinds of facility for public. Besides shopping they are able to do different tasks with Internet. For example, students attend the online class, scholars do research project and contact with counterparts in distant to share their academic experience. As a result, It is rational to have plan for things that cover broader area of needs than public transportation which only serve traverse.
Finally, while improving vehicles as an improvement plan in public transportation would reduce the human emission, these plans will increase the volume of transportation which in turn, lead to more air pollution.
In conclusion, the broad merits of access to Internet result in more demand of investment in this subject because Internet not only facilitate the way of people's life but also eliminate the need for transporting and contribute to healthy environment. So, I agree with the more importance of spending money to improve Internet than public transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Internet) must be used with a third-person verb: 'networks'.
Suggestion: networks
...llocate more budget to improve Internet network than public transportation for three ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ed to go to malls and hyperstars to buy a clothe or their food because they are easily a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'planned'.
Suggestion: planned
...ce. As a result, It is rational to have plan for things that cover broader area of n...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51592356688 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05580508937 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4632189145 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.882352941 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327933533127 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120600541486 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119972309855 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194422365102 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068481081638 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.