Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Undoubtedly, leadership is an essential character for social development. Social advance is greatly related to a good leader who can change the social conformity with his magic stick. However, some people think that leadership is totally an intrinsic and others express it is an extrinsic. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelmed. Among this controversy, I prefer later one which I elaborate in followings.

First and foremost, leadership is not innate rather it is a learnable character. It depends on own personal development and concerns of the social aspect. Moreover, social interaction with the people put forward a person to become a leader. For particular, Mahatma Gandhi was one of the popular leaders of India who protect against British for their oppressive activity in the early time of his leadership. He was from an ordinary family and when he was young he was not to be a leader. But, later he could not able to tolerate the dictatorial activity of the English and protect against the English government. Public liked his pattrisom for the country which compelled him to become a leader. Moreover, his personality, wisdom, decision making which raise hope to the general public's mind. The same phenomenon happened in Bangladesh with the prime minister Sheikh Hasina. After studying her biography I knew that she never wanted to be a leader but in 1972 the situation of Bangladesh was so horrible that some of the major leaders persuaded her to appear to leadership. For holding the position she had to prepare herself for several months. Thus, leadership is not actually by born, it also depends on own personal perspective.

Furthermore, to become a good leader always required time to prepare yourself. To develop own knowledge, adapt to the situation and also make people motivated with own's speech. For instance, I have a friend in college who was very shy and cannot express his opinion in public even in the classroom in front of the teacher. He knew his weakness and always try to improve yourself as a public speaker. In university first year I noticed that he not anymore an introvert person. Moreover, I surprise when I watched him speak in the public stage in the final year of the university. He is now the leader of the young club and a motivational speaker who was once an introvert person.

To recapitulate, leadership is an extrinsic feature and to develop this skill not only essential personal development but also necessary social adept. It is a skill that can people learnt by hard-working and diligence.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...y an intrinsic and others express it is an extrinsic. Not surprisingly, the number of contro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 687, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... country which compelled him to become a leader. Moreover, his personality, wisdo...
^^
Line 5, column 1010, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...tion of Bangladesh was so horrible that some of the major leaders persuaded her to appear t...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, thus, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04195804196 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88311538311 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498834498834 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.287745674 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1923076923 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104432679278 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286494708315 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0254525799561 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0603305749105 0.150856017488 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326426739182 0.0645574589148 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.