Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
"People learn things better from those at their own level - such as fellow students or co-workers - than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors."
People are learning and studying most of the time they awake. They have always looked for a possible partner to help them realize what the solutions should be. In my opinion, I think that it is better to learn from someone who is a higher stage than us. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore through the following essay.
First of all, the professor has a broad, deep and more aspect than ordinary people, which is bring about the effective unexpected solution. It is better to get a lot of choices to make a crucial decision. On the other hand, if we learn or study from the limited knowledge people, we will also get limited choices to solve the problems we face. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About two years ago, I have started my senior project about the hydrological model for graduation, and I knew about the model but not for this tremendous scale. I started surfing on the internet and asked my friends how to deal with it. Unfortunately, I get the limit of the answer that made me nervous about graduation very much but my friends talked to me that I should go to ask the professor. After talking with the professor in a few hours, I got a clear perspective and more choices to solve my problems. Without asking the professor, I think I would be stuck at that point forever.
Secondly, Learning from the experts could save a lot of time, which we could use this time to do something more productive. The experts have a broad knowledge in their heads, so it is simple to get the ideas. Instead of, finding a solution with our same level friends and the inevitable internet friend could take a lot of time to screen the tons of information which one is the right and correct data to help us solve the face problems. For instance, after I asked the professor about my senior project problems. I got plenty of time before the deadline. I used that time to focus on writing the report and the journal publishing paper to be more perfect.
Finally, I am of the opinion that it is a benefit to learn something from the experts. That's because not only they could give us the right possible choices to let us make a decision, but also not to waste our precious time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...e aspect than ordinary people, which is bring about the effective unexpected solution...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'broad knowledge'.
Suggestion: broad knowledge
...thing more productive. The experts have a broad knowledge in their heads, so it is simple to get ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...it to learn something from the experts. Thats because not only they could give us the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, i think, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46437346437 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46649517578 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503685503686 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9898474541 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5238095238 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968213917572 0.236089414692 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310130511503 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374784324893 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642579167034 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241069300476 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.