Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all undeniable merits of awareness of social and political affairs, I firmly concur with the idea that teachers should not make their social and political attitudes to students. The following paragraphs will substantiate the most outstanding reasons.
First of all, one should take into account this significant fact that students are not mature enough to distinguish between different political and social views. Hence, when teachers impose their ideas to students, they cannot have an unbiased interpretation of different events. To illustrate, one needs only to refer to the number of people who were imposed by their teachers in their childhood and they could not modify their attitudes even in their adulthood. To demonstrate, most of the scientist all over the world contend that teachers’ statements directly influence on students’ minds. So they established an experimental program worldwide to estimate the effectiveness of teachers’ attitudes on their students’ minds. The results are surprising: over 90 percent of people still follow their teachers’ attitude even after several years. As a matter of fact, they never make a decision about political and social affairs by their own.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should consider another subtle point meticulously that there are copious beneficial sciences which can be thought for students. In fact, to enhance their chance for finding an appropriate job, students should be skillful in several fields. Nowadays, companies prefer to hire graduates skillful in several fields, in addition to their major expertise. The modern world offers abundant examples of topics such as the computer, mathematics, marketing and so forth which by learning students can progress dramatically. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that the majority of students who could exploit their time efficiently in school are prosperous businessmen compared students who waste their time by listening to political and social statements of their teachers.
Efficient teaching in schools is vital to every teacher to survive their students in today's tough life. Taking all aforementioned arguments into account leads us to the conclusion that we should contemplate about efficient methodologies of teaching in schools. If teachers do not make their social and political views to students not only help them to make decisions independently but also save their time for learning some valuable subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent social research'.
Suggestion: recent social research
...ly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research in our country, show that the majority ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, still, apart from, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64735516373 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04055790185 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55919395466 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1074651714 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.882352941 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3529411765 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299577196392 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968027075833 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600799059421 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196750932854 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293714173792 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.