Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
There is no doubt that nowadays, teachers play the crucial role in people's lives. NO one can deny the influence of knowledge and education on our daily lives. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is when the teachers were more appreciated by society? Now or in the past. Some people may hold this viewpoint that is in the past time the teacher was more valued. However, some others may take opposite viewpoint and believe that they were more appreciated by society in today's and a teacher is a most important effect is their society. I firmly subscribe to this idea, and the reasons I believe so are manifold, which will be discussed widely hereunder.
One of the reasons the coming to the mind at first is that in today's, the society and government more allocate money from budget to income and revenue of teachers in every year because of teachers need more concentration on their work which how they can invent innovation path to provide the best contents for education. If they have a concern about their income, they most do another job to earn money, causing improper and inefficient yield on teaching students, due to maybe students have an indecent education, which can be unfavorable and adverse effect on their future life. in this regard, a renowned proverb state " architecture is putting one brick in the first row of the wall incorrectly that wall approach sky is wrong." Therefore, the society has a lot of endeavors to provide a suitable life for teachers; On the other hand, past people did not care about how teachers were living even how they were teaching their students, and teachers' life was overlooked by previous people.
Secondly, in the modern societies put one day of the year for prized and honored about role and importance of teachers. This day all of students and parents buy some gifts for teachers who were appreciated by society for their efforts and diligent to the education of students. This day helps that not only students recognize and realize the degree of teachers in the community, but learn how to admire and appreciate teacher as well. They act accordingly for paving the way for students prosperous in their future. On the contrary, people in the past had not any days which prize teacher, and then they did worse act for example in the 15th-century teachers are punished as prejudice man for even minutely presumably wrong actions such as punish students or give lot of assignments for more learning students
To wrap it up, it is my profound belief that teacher more was appreciated in today by society due to modern society now know the significance of role teacher in the upbringing of students correctly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
... may hold this viewpoint that is in the past time the teacher was more valued. However, s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 581, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...nd adverse effect on their future life. in this regard, a renowned proverb state &...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, no doubt, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2241.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86117136659 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63497042783 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503253796095 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 131.25683051 48.9658058833 268% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 149.4 100.406767564 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7333333333 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 5.45110844103 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262292929337 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995036225144 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673141259344 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177042031501 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400602538021 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.