The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many ne friends easily.
In todays evey person needs friend in every stage of life. A controversial question arise in this issue, which of friends more provide happiness for people. Some people old and prolonged friends more reliable and dependable for them, conversely, other people belief opposite side this topic. My oppinion, I subscribe the first idea, and explaine my notion about it hereunder.
First and foremost, when every person and heman confron with some predicament and inclement situation in the during of span of their life, an old and long period friends can be more reliable and dependable as a shelter for the people. Because this friend know every trait of their friend and can comprehend them who were in this situation, which cuase help and rescue them with advise and counsel for this disaster position. On the other hand, new friend was oblivious and unaware with their traits and characteristics even their advise indicate misleading way for them. As a psycological standpoint, an old friend more helpful in the solving problems which comes in their life, and their hint be more pracitical for a precarrious problems rather than other people’s notion who opposite side this topic. By doing so, their raletionship more durable and stronger after this occurrences and events.
Secondly, the most of the work and business activity need more loyal and faithful to collaborate in the between people to reach dramatically their goals and making pave the way to prosperous. Therefore, this coorpative is required not only more old friends but more strong raletionship between them as well. In the emperical study from Asia contient says that, businessing old friendship in a project more be posperous, and avoid and prevent them to be failuer, can get an impressive accomplish and achive in this coorpativetion.
All in all, in my opinion, more loyal and dependable for every people than the new friends who are even arose some difficultis in the raletionship and more disaster for people and prevent them from happiness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more provide happiness for people. Some people old and prolonged friends more re...
^^
Line 2, column 712, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... life, and their hint be more pracitical for a precarrious problems rather than o...
^^
Line 2, column 780, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a opposite'.
Suggestion: who is a opposite
... rather than other people's notion who opposite side this topic. By doing so, their ral...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 874, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ionship more durable and stronger after this occurrences and events. Secondly, the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore loyal and faithful to collaborate in the between people to reach dramatically...
^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'arisen'.
Suggestion: arisen
...eople than the new friends who are even arose some difficultis in the raletionship an...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76386395926 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512121212121 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0263255856 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.384615385 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202634246848 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083981054178 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469324368997 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141246857367 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241866706237 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.