Friends play a pivotal role in the peoples' life to feel much happines. Some people believe that maintaining friendship with a small number of people in long period of time is more significant in feeling happiness. However, others believe that make many new friend is better. In my opinion keeping old friend over a long period of time is more essential than making many new friends. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, old friends know you better which is more helpful for every body. When you have problem in your life and need some advice old friends may would help you mor efficent than new friend who have not any information about your behaviur. My own experience is a good example in this case. When I was younger and wanted to start my universty I have doubt about my interesting fild of study in university. One day I decided to concul with one of my close friend who knews me for 10 years. She gave me a great advice to choos my interest filds of study in university. This circumstance give mee a chance to make my decision more convicly rather than I wanted to choose alown. This example clearly illustrates that having old friend could be really helpfuul in our relationship.
Seconds, it is easier to trust to your old friend rather than new friends. When you find new friends you need time to know each other better and then trust to your friend while, old friend could trust you more because you knoe each other for a long time. For instance, I remember when I have problem in my life I share my problem whit my old friend. I coldnt trus my new friend I felt than they never understand mee and may not importantn for them to be in touch with me. Therefor I decided to share my problem whit my old friend. This situation help mee to feel better and never thioth that my mistery will reveal by my old friend. This example obviously shows that old you can more trust to your old friend rather than new friends.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that maintaining friendship in a small group is more important for happiness than make many new friends for two reasons. It is not only help you to have more helpfull circumstances, But also help you to have more trustworthy relationship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
Friends play a pivotal role in the peoples life to feel much happines. Some people...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...elieve that maintaining friendship with a small number of people in long period of time is more s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...p with a small number of people in long period of time is more significant in feeling happines...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... opinion keeping old friend over a long period of time is more essential than making many new ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great advice'.
Suggestion: great advice
... who knews me for 10 years. She gave me a great advice to choos my interest filds of study in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, then, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44068358199 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441463414634 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9642799725 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8636363636 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290833397747 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1032540861 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968788478631 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234886922001 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104033484148 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.