Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's progressive world we live in, no one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that friends play an indispensable role in the people's life. Even though some sociologists claim that the capability to maintain friendships with a small number of people for a long period of time is superior to the ability to make many new friends, I would go against this opinion. In my view, people should be able to make new friends as many as possible. There are two main reasons why I feel this way, which are going to be explained in the following essay.
In the first place, there is always the possibility that people leave their city and immigrate to another location. In other words, if some people leave their city, they will not frequently see their friends anymore. So, it is crucial for them to be able to make new friends in their new location. By doing this, they will kill two birds with one stone because they can not only learn new things from new people, but also will not get depressed. As a case in point, when I was 20, I had to immigrate to Paris. It was so difficult for me to leave my friends but, due to the mentioned strategy, I made a lot of friends in Paris and gradually forgot my older friends and got rid of my depressing feelings.
Another factor that should be taken into consideration is that everybody's friends are not 100 percent perfect. Therefore, trying to maintain that friendship may not be the best idea. Consider a envious friend. If a person tries to compromise with them, although they become prosperous in reaching that purpose, it may not lead to the happy ending. An experience in my brother's life could be a proper example to illustrate this point. He is always saying that, "The more adverse behavior your friends have, the less success you will have in the future." This saying comes from his unfavorable happenings to him in the past, which are all because of the effects of his friends on his life.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is significant for people to have the ability to make new friends easily and as much as possible. This is mainly because of possibility of leaving the older friends and the possibility of adverse behavior for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...iends play an indispensable role in the peoples life. Even though some sociologists cla...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...capability to maintain friendships with a small number of people for a long period of time is sup...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ith a small number of people for a long period of time is superior to the ability to make many...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ship may not be the best idea. Consider a envious friend. If a person tries to co...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, i feel, in conclusion, in my view, in other words, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5664160401 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55925192508 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8322471928 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.222222222 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26195463293 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788180353458 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803992372333 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166567756131 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764445502362 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.