Do you agree or disagree with this following statement,the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reason and example to support your answer
The travel is important part of past time and leisure plans in our life because of having travel plan at least one time among every 6 month is necessary for being vibrant and energetic. Some people agree with the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide and some other people disagree with that. But I think to have leader tour in a group is better plan to trip and I state my ideas by two reason as follows.
At the First place I firmly believe having leader group has essential rule in organization of plans in different steps on trip. Leaders are usually experienced
persons about travel and they know historical places and landscapes in diversity areas.
Leader’s consciousness can prevent of waste time and possible hazards during the travel. Leaders often preordain destination places so, it is not needed to spend time for decision and to certain about later plans. On the other hand it’s decreased entering in detour and danger of losing for members of the group. For instance a few years ago when the group of Germany’s tourists came in my country, they lost main path in northwest mountains and two of them fall down of rock and they injured. Later it became clear that the group had begun to travel without a guide. As a result having a guider to hinder of member’s voluntary activities.
In the Second place, which deserves some words here, every travel is great experience for all people. In another word, people can improve their knowledge in different grounds such as historical, geographic, literature, art and other science…
It seems having a good guider in the period of trip facilitates to gain training advantageous along with leisure purposes during the travel. For example it is proved that people are interested in knowing about mythology events in every area and finding the legend’s historical origin. Often leaders have pretty information about like these issues, and hearing like data and narrates of guiders makes more sweeter moments for travelers and tourists.
Consequently having a guider in a group has different beneficiary and by leader travelers can visit most important historical, artistic, landscape place and other place that finding these place is hard to unfamiliar people, so it makes to create more memorable moments in travel. On the other hand leader makes more safe travel without waste time for lateral problems such as: losing and finding locality and other …
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 33, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
The travel is important part of past time and leisure plans in our life because o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on trip. Leaders are usually experienced persons about travel and they know histo...
^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'sweeter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: sweeter
...like data and narrates of guiders makes more sweeter moments for travelers and tourists. C...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...r moments for travelers and tourists. Consequently having a guider in a group has differen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, so, at least, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98540145985 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63655140642 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535279805353 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4849287417 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.529411765 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1764705882 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139187991267 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514608430614 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648707022025 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661020594944 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628728001013 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.